Candidates should ensure they have backups of research material. Theses worth less credits may have lower word limits and candidates are reminded to check the specific regulations for their degree. Theses will normally be written in English and must conform to proper standards of linguistic presentation. Should the examiners find that the thesis falls short of such standards, they may request that it be corrected before the examination proper is undertaken.
Such approval will only be given in exceptional circumstances. The format of the thesis should be agreed to by the Department, supervisor and the student, during the earlier stages of the writing.
Any changes which may need to be made later should be agreed to again by these parties. There are certain physical requirements to be adhered to which are set out in thesis information pamphlets available from the Central Library or Departments and in the regulations pertaining to the presentation of theses. Illustrative materials such as maps, computer disks and CDs may be submitted with the thesis.
They must either be bound with the thesis or placed in a pocket inside the cover.
Extensive or bulky material relevant to the thesis may be bound separately as an appendix. There are three principal methods of citing references in a text: footnotes, the author-date and the reference-number system. Supervisors should be consulted as to the method favoured in the particular subject area.
There are particular rules for each, and it is important to be consistent in the application of the method decided upon. Footnotes may be used for purposes other than citing references, namely to provide cross-references, to acknowledge indebtedness and to explain or supplement material that is included in the text. Bibliographic style is important, and considerable time will be saved if all the necessary data for each citation are collected at the time of consulting the works concerned, particularly if the references are saved using referencing software such as EndNote or Zotero.
Various styles are acceptable; the important point again to remember is that, having decided on a particular style, students should retain this style throughout the bibliography.
There may be a preferred method within a discipline; students should check with their supervisor s. The Library contains various authorities for consultation on styles of footnoting and bibliographies. Academic integrity means being honest in your writing, with appropriate referencing of sources. It is is defined as copying or paraphrasing another's work, whether intentionally or otherwise, and presenting it as one's own.
Research is not summarising or repeating uncritically the ideas of others. Candidates should also be extremely cautious about depending heavily on review articles for their Literature Review. While these are often very helpful, they can also lead to undue reliance upon both the ideas and actual words of other workers.
The natural way is to do so in collaboration with your former supervisor. A simple way is to just publish the master thesis directly on arXiv but check first whether that is legally possibly with the university. The OP submitted his thesis to gain a Master's degree. It has in effect been handed over to the university and to all intents and purposes has become the possession of the university. On the other hand, the OP, unless he has signed a non-disclosure agreement, would probably be able to make use of the knowledge gained in researching his thesis to publish further material based on that knowledge and thus pre-empt anyone else claiming credit for the OP's work.
There's no point in getting too up-tight about such matters, though.
Many of us have had work we've done published by others unaltered and without any attribution or credit. The Stack Overflow podcast is back! Listen to an interview with our new CEO. Sign up to join this community. The best answers are voted up and rise to the top. Home Questions Tags Users Unanswered.
Jun 19, Writing a thesis is tough. Current or recent graduate students understand the time and effort required to successfully complete their research. Although the main aim of your postgraduate program will be for you to be awarded a masters degree or a. Doctorate, it will add considerably to your.
What should I do? Ask Question. Asked 9 months ago. Active 9 months ago. Viewed 12k times. Do you know what you signed when you first signed up for the Masters course? There may have been a bunch of legalese in that regarding ownership and rights on the completed thesis. Needs further information. What country are you in? In the US, at least in my experience, a thesis is automatically "published" even if not as a journal article once it is accepted.
Were you funded to do your research? Then as I understand US law, the results belong to your employer. If they use content from your thesis without citing you it's basically plagiarism. It would not be good research ethic anyway. After all, citing you is not a problem. If they "only" use your gathered data, which they may have rights on, it is IMHO not yet plagiarism but you should be at least cited or acknowledged. Usually being on the authors list is common practice and not doing that might be very rude depending on the amount of your input on the paper.
What you can do, if you find out to which journal they sent to, is to contact this journal and tell them that this paper contains your data for which you are not credited. I know of one case where the journal pulled the already accepted paper after such a complaint in a very similar case adviser published paper on PhD graduates data without crediting her at all. You could also complain to the science board of your university, which might be a good first step before contacting the journal.
Note that both will NOT make you any new friends on your previous university! Isn't the problem that they're threatening to publish it without crediting you? See a similar discussion here.
Spark Spark 14k 8 8 gold badges 31 31 silver badges 52 52 bronze badges. On the other hand, he may have paid a substantial fee for all that supported you, offered you tools free access to software to develop your tools, access to your advisor, an office, classes you took, perhaps a laptop and computing services etc.
I agree that the data is not "only" mine. As you say, I didn't work alone. However, I don't think that not crediting me as an author is correct from their part either. On another note, my thesis wasn't published and it's not available to the public. Once you submitted your thesis to your institution then it is usually in the public domain.
You should most certainly be credited for your work as I mention! Here's MIT's repository as an example libguides. Spark Public domain! The OP states that the thesis is not public but only available to his advisor and a small set of selected people.
This agreement might likely include the primary data and would be violated if the OP publishes the data without written consent of the PI or the university. Ghanima The question doesn't make it clear if the thesis is not available because there is an NDA, or because nobody ever bothered to make it public.
If there is an NDA, then there is the question, what does it cover? If the advisor can publish a paper based on the data, then maybe the data itself is publishable too, the OP should consult somebody for such details. If the data itself is indeed not publisheable, then the OP could still ask for the advisor to cite the thesis as a proxy for the data citation. Even if it is not available, it is citeable.
To decide how to proceed, there are several aspects to consider here: if they use the data without crediting you, they "stole" the results.
The main benefits of this approach were that I was still in school and therefore geographically close to my mentors, which facilitated ongoing communication throughout the process, and that the manuscript was under review by a journal before I started my new job. Note that both will NOT make you any new friends on your previous university! From a proprietary perspective, you did not work alone. Also, use of published material requires crediting the author s of that material by including relevant citations. Since I was changing the focus of the manuscript, I had to do an additional literature search and produce much of the writing from scratch. There are particular rules for each, and it is important to be consistent in the application of the method decided upon. Furthermore, peer review is an integral component of publication.
They definitely can't do that without repercussions and they shouldn't have threatened you! These are the criteria that I would consider foremost in such a situation. Captain Emacs Captain Emacs About first author - sometimes when looking at paper, if the first author has loads of titles, then I assume that the last two authors listed did the real work If the data was published as part of the thesis, it's in public domain, and can be used depending on the specific license that was used. If OP refuses to be a co-author the authors could still credit them in an acknowledgement "User gathered the data.
They didn't "steal" anything. The results are owned by the institution, not the OP. The OP can refuse to publish, but he cannot control what happens to any data or results from the work he did, because that is entirely owned by the institution. Which is the same reason he can't take those results and start his own company using them, of course. They are also within their rights not to credit him as an author. They may credit him with gathering experimental data, but this does not necessarily make you an author of a paper.
Graham It depends on the intellectual contribution required to gather the data.